250 word discussion responds
The second set of readings – 1979, 1989, 1995 – again reflect some passage of time in the field. One possible unifying thread is the limitations that come with certain ways of thinking: the “skills” vs. “humanistic” reading of introductory technical writing courses in Miller, the old communicative models that Driskill counters with more social ones, and Rude’s critique of typical report-writing pedagogies.
However, perhaps more telling is the section title: “Rhetorical Perspectives.” What do these three authors mean when they say “rhetoric” or “rhetorical” or “rhetorical situation”? Are they in line with Rutter’s use of the concept from the previous readings?
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more