1-  Sketch out the logical problem of evil, premises through conclusion. 

2-  What is the greater-good defense?

3-  What is the free will defense? 

4-  “The success of a noseeum inference requires that it be reasonable to presume that we would be able to see X if X were to actually exist.” 

What does this mean? 

How does it related to the author’s response to the problem of evil?

5-  How does the distinction between fully human and merely human help resolve the apparent inconsistency of Christ’s incarnation and dual nature? 

6-  What are five philosophical presuppositions that are necessary in order to do modern science? And why is science unable to ground them? 

7-  According to the textbook, why is Hume’s argument against miracles guilty of circular reasoning? 

8-  What are the six essential historical facts (data points) that are best explained by the bodily resurrection of Jesus as given in the chapter. Explain how a bodily resurrection explains these data points better than alternative explanations. 

9-  Do you agree that all humans possess an internal sense of the divine (sensus divinitatis)? Why or why not? 

10- What do you think is the strongest argument for the truthfulness of Christianity as presented in this chapter?

Short answer questions (but use enough detail to clearly explain)