Assignment 2.1: Justification Report – Part 1
Due Week 3 and worth 150 points
In Assignments 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3, you will be building up a formal, researched justification report (one part at a time) that culminates in a recommendation to implement a particular product, service, or program in your place of employment. This recommended product, service, or program should resolve a problem that you identify in your workplace and should be directed to your employer (even if you do not actually plan to share it with your employer).
Use the basic outline below to draft Assignment 2. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:
Using the provided template, write Part 1 of a single-spaced report in which you:
Your assignment must:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Click here to view the grading rubric.
…Points: 150
Assignment 2.1: Justification Report – Part 1
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B
Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Discuss in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely discussed in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
Insufficiently discussed in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
Partially discussed in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
Satisfactorily discussed in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
Thoroughly discussed in detail a problem at work, persuading and convincing the reader that it needs fixing.
2. Provide a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
Weight: 20%
Did not submit or incompletely provided a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
Insufficiently provided a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
Partially provided a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
Satisfactorily provided a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
Thoroughly provided a detailed description of two (2) possible solutions (“alternatives”) that could be implemented to resolve the problem identified in Question 1.
3. List and describe five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely listed and described five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2.
Insufficiently listed and described five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2.
Partially listed and described five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2.
Satisfactorily listed and described five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2.
Thoroughly listed and described five (5) criteria that you will use to measure the worth of each alternative in Question 2.
4. Describe in detail how you will conduct the research needed to determine the best alternative to recommend to your employer.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or incompletely described in detail how you will conduct the research needed to the best alternative to recommend to your employer.
Insufficiently described in detail how you will conduct the research needed to determine the best alternative to recommend to your employer.
Partially described in detail how you will conduct the research needed to determine the best alternative to recommend to your employer.
Satisfactorily described in detail how you will conduct the research needed to determine the best alternative to recommend to your employer.
Thoroughly described in detail how you will conduct the research needed to the best alternative to recommend to your employer.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements.
Weight: 30%
More than 8 errors present.
7-8 errors present.
5-6 errors present.
3-4 errors present.
0-2 errors present.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more
Recent Comments